A woman whose husband poisoned her with an abortion pill is speaking at the Supreme Court


WASHINGTON — As the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the Biden administration's loosening of abortion pill rules on Tuesday, a woman whose husband was jailed for slipping abortion drugs into her drinks in hopes of aborting their child when the couple went through a breakup, shared her. a story

In an interview outside the courthouse with The Christian Post, Catherine Herring said that in March 2022, her husband, Mason, spiked her drink with abortion drugs after she told him she was pregnant.

Mason Herring, a Texas attorney, drew national headlines in February when he was sentenced to 180 days in jail and 10 years probation. He was initially charged with felony assault to induce abortion but pleaded guilty to injury to a child and assault of a pregnant person. Catherine Herring is now revealing her story to the press as the divorce proceedings continue.

Get Our Latest For Free

Subscribe to receive a daily/weekly email with the best stories (plus special offers!) from The Christian Post. Be the first to know.

The couple were married for 11 years and went through a separation during the pregnancy.

“This pregnancy was a complete surprise,” she explained. “I found out about a week after he asked for a divorce that I was pregnant. His first reaction was that this would 'ruin his plans' and make him look like a 'stupid'.”

According to Herring, the couple began marriage counseling to work on their relationship. Given that they began counseling to work on reconciliation, Herring said what her husband then tried to do was “a complete surprise.”

On the morning of March 17, 2022, Herring recalls her husband bringing her breakfast in bed and instructing her to drink a cup of water, urging her to “stay hydrated” throughout her pregnancy. Herring said that while she was eating breakfast and drinking the water, her husband started insisting that she drink faster, and he became angry because she was drinking too slowly.

After Herring's husband told her to scoop up the water because he had to leave for the office, she looked down and noticed the cloudiness of the water. When she asked her husband what was in the cup, he blamed the dirty water on dirty pipes.

“Or maybe he grabbed a dirty cup,” Herring said her husband offered as another possible explanation. “But he took the cup and, about 30 minutes later, I started getting violently ill. I had severe diarrhea and cramps, and I started bleeding a few hours later.”

She had never spoken to a pregnancy helpline before, but on the morning of the first poisoning attempt, Herring suddenly remembered seeing an article discussing a ban on advertising abortion pill reversals. Herring found the number for the hotline after she Googled “abortion pill reversal.”

The abortion reversal process works by providing progesterone to a woman who has taken the first drug in the chemical abortion regimen. Medical professionals who offer an abortion pill claim that, if taken at a certain point, the treatment may be able to save the pregnancy.

“I was able to talk to a nurse,” Herring said. “We weren't sure what was in the cup but we thought maybe he was trying to do something to harm the baby. [The nurse] recommended that I start a dose of progesterone.”

“And by the grace of God, I already had a prescription in my medication from a previous pregnancy,” she added. “So, I was able to take the right dose right away.”

Herring said she later went to the emergency room, but her husband never came to visit. After the first attempt to abort her baby failed, Herring told CP that Mason Herring tried to poison her six more times over the course of two months.

She started gathering evidence. With the help of a private investigator, Herring caught her husband in the act on a hidden camera. She took the evidence to the police.

Despite her husband's attempt to abort their child, Herring confirmed that her daughter is alive and is currently 19 months old.

“She suffers from a lot of developmental issues,” the mother said. “But she's alive.”

The nation's Supreme Court heard oral arguments related to a legal challenge regarding the US Food & Drug Administration loosening restrictions on mifepristone, the first drug in the chemical abortion regimen.

Mifepristone works by blocking the progesterone hormone needed to support a healthy pregnancy, and it starves the unborn child to death.

In 2021, the FDA reduced the regulations on mifepristone, allowing women to get it through the mail without seeing a personal physician. Before that, in 2016, the FDA eliminated the requirement for abortionists to report non-fatal chemical abortion complications.

Catherine Herring's story comes amid efforts in Colorado to ban doctors from giving progesterone to women who have taken the first pill in the abortion pill regimen but wish to keep their unborn child, said to be the first law of its kind in the nation. The law was put on hold last year by a federal judge until a lawsuit against it by a Catholic health organization can be adjudicated.

CP also spoke with Elizabeth Gillette, who told the outlet that she ended up on the bathroom floor in a pool of blood after taking chemical abortion drugs.

Fourteen years ago, Gillette faced an unexpected pregnancy and obtained the drugs from Planned Parenthood in McMinnville, Oregon, which has since been closed.

Gillette claims that the Planned Parenthood staff reassured her that she might experience bleeding that would feel like a “double period” and some cramping, but nothing that should prevent her from going to work the next day.

She told CP that her experience was “vastly different” from what Planned Parenthood said would happen.

“I ended up in a pool of blood on the bathroom floor, and I ended up holding the transparent amniotic sac with a recognizable baby inside, and I had to flush my baby,” Gillette said. “Nobody told me that was even a possibility. They told me there would be some clotting.”

Gillette said she still suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder 14 years later, and she's been seeking help through counseling for about six years now. She also said that, after the abortion, there was no aftercare, nor was there a doctor's visit.

“Nobody cared,” she said. “I thought I was going to die, and nobody cared.”

“I decided to share my story because my child's life matters,” Gillette said. “And because of what I've been through, no woman should ever have to go through that. Women deserve the truth. And when people only hear half the story, someone has to stand up.”

Multiple pro-life and pro-choice activists gathered outside the Supreme Court.

Many held signs warning of the dangers of the abortion pill, while others held signs that read “Safe Abortion Is a Human Right.”

Terrisa Bukovinac, founder of Progressive Anti-Abortion Uprising, told CP that she was outside the court to “oppose an instrument of genocide,” referring to the abortion pill.

In response to a question about what she thought of abortion advocates accusing pro-lifers of forcing their religion on others, Bukovinac, who is a pro-life atheist, stated, “Opposing genocide should cross secular and religious lines.”

“Most women are dealing with financial difficulties,” Bukovinac said of the women who typically seek chemical abortions. “I'm a pro-life progressive, and I believe we need serious financial safety nets for people who are pregnant and parenting in this nation.”

Bukovinac accused the abortion industry of exploiting women and families who feel as if they don't have any other options. She called on the pro-life movement to continue expanding the resources available to pregnant women and to reduce the influence of the abortion industry by limiting access to abortion drugs.

“You can't be anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-capitalist and support the abortion industry,” Bukovinako said.

Caroline Taylor Smith, the executive director of PAAU, told CP that opposing violence is a progressive view and that “abortion is clearly violence.” She claims that even though the unborn are typically in an early stage of development when a woman undergoes the chemical abortion regimen, the drugs continue to poison a person.

“I think we have to follow science, and we have to learn from history,” said the PAAU executive director. “And my conclusion, and the conclusion everyone should have, is that abortion pills should be removed from society. They are not safe.”

Dr. Susan Bane of the American Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, an OB-GYN with more than 20 years of experience, told CP that the FDA's removal of mifepristone safeguards sends a message to women that “you don't need ongoing health care. .”

“So that's a message to say I can just order these online, and this will be an easy process,” Bane said.

“And then what I hear from my patients is just the opposite,” she added. “They were in terrible pain, and they were bleeding so heavily, and they didn't have the ability to ask questions during their informed consent process, and they didn't have the follow-up that they needed.”

“They're on their own during this process, and that's not the norm for how we take care of women in this country,” Bane continued.

Julie Marie Blake, senior counsel for regulatory litigation at Alliance Defending Freedom, said the FDA's own label says chemical abortion drugs send one in 25 women to the emergency room, which could equate to about 25,000 women going to the emergency room. last year

Blake stated that women need ongoing care from a doctor when taking drugs, which she noted are “high risk.”

“The FDA had no authority and no evidence when it removed crucial safeguards on chemical abortion drugs, such as the continued personal care of a physician,” Blake told CP. “So, we stand to hold the FDA accountable. We're asking the Supreme Court to restore these crucial safeguards to ensure women have a personal doctor.”

Source: www.christianpost.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *