Singer Marilyn Manson has hit back at Evan Rachel Wood’s claims he threatened her younger son, inflicting the actress handy over major custody of the kid to her ex-Jamie Bell resulting from security fears. According to authorized paperwork obtained by The Blast, the actress, 35, has agreed for son Jack, 9, to ‘primarily’ stay with Bell, 36, in Los Angeles – resulting from fears she may very well be placing the kid at risk by residing with him – after Manson made the alleged threats. Sources additionally instructed the publication Wood is ‘extraordinarily afraid of placing her son at risk’ – 17 months after she claimed in a court docket declaration Manson, 54, instructed her he would ‘f**ok’ her then eight-year-old son – Manson denied the declare. Speaking to DailyMail, a supply near Manson – actual identify Brian Warner – denied Wood’s claims, berated Wood for ‘making unproven claims publicly’ and stated the singer’s personal security had been threatened after Wood’s girlfriend Illma Gore allegedly used a solid FBI letter to recruit different girls into accusing Manson of abuse. The a part of the lawsuit coping with the letter was later thrown out. Evan Woods with Mason Manson has confronted quite a few claims of sexual abuse and human trafficking. More than a dozen girls, together with Wood, accuse him of abuse – accusations Manson has denied.The supply stated: ‘Brian Warner has not had any contact nor communications of any form with Evan Rachel Wood in almost a decade.’At no time has Brian Warner ever threatened Ms. Wood or her household.’Wood has not supplied a shred of proof of Warner making any threats towards her or her household.’Wood continues to make unproven claims publicly and to the court docket based mostly on a fraudulent FBI letter that was created and written by her and her confederate, Illma Gore, throughout their coordinated assault on Warner.’In his personal declaration to the court docket in his custody battle, Mr. Bell has stated that Evans story defies credibility.’The solely individuals whose security has been threatened are Warner and his spouse [Lindsay Usich], who had been swatted at their dwelling based mostly on a duplicitous cellphone name made to the FBI by Illma Gore, who claimed to be a buddy of the couple.’In November 2022 Manson sued Wood and Gore for defamation over what he known as the ‘malicious’ and ‘false’ sexual abuse allegations they’ve made towards himWood has stated that Manson ‘brainwashed and manipulated her into submission’ and that he ‘began grooming me after I was a teen’Manson’s lawyer stated in late September in court docket that Gore had used an allegedly solid FBI letter to recruit different girls into accusing his consumerGore has denied Manson’s claims and stated she was reaching out to his exes and ladies who confronted home violence for the HBO documentary Phoenix RisingIn his lawsuit, Manson had claimed that of their alleged FBI letter forgery, they impersonated an FBI agent to distribute the letter to ‘create the false look’ that Manson’s alleged victims and their households had been at risk.He additionally accused them of recruiting, coordinating and pressuring girls into making false accusations of abuse towards Manson. And he alleges that Gore hacked into his laptop, cellphone and electronic mail account, acquiring his passwords and social safety quantity.Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Teresa A. Beaudet dismissed the a part of the go well with coping with the disputed FBI letter, which Wood denies forging.Beaudet additionally tossed out a piece that alleges Wood and Gore used a guidelines discovered on an iPad for different girls to make use of to make abuse claims about Manson.The decide didn’t rule on the deserves of the FBI letter, however discovered that the proof that the defendants used it to recruit different girls and hurt Manson was hypothetical and skinny.Evidence was additionally missing that Wood and Gore created the guidelines, Beaudet discovered. She stated the chance of Manson prevailing on both half was low.Beaudets ruling relied on California legislation meant to guard the free speech of defendants from being squelched by lawsuits.Woods lawyer Michael Kump stated in an announcement: ‘We are very happy with the Courts ruling, which affirms and protects Evans train of her basic First Amendment rights. As the Court accurately discovered, Plaintiff failed to point out that his claims towards her have even minimal benefit.Mansons lawyer Howard King stated he deliberate a right away enchantment: ‘The ruling is disappointing however not surprising.’The Court telegraphed this final result when it refused to think about the bombshell sworn declaration of former plaintiff Ashley Smithline, which detailed how girls had been systematically pressured by Evan Rachel Wood and Illma Gore to make false claims about Brian Warner.’Wood at the moment resides in Nashville, Tennessee, and has beforehand been preventing to maintain her son out of LA.In the submitting, Wood and Bell have agreed their son will ‘primarily stay with (him) in Los Angeles, (Wood) shall have custody of Jack one (1) prolonged weekend per 30 days from Friday, after college or 10:00 a.m.’Wood will even have custody of Jack for holidays reminiscent of Spring Break.In July 2022, Bell claimed the pair had shared ‘equal custody of Jack for seven years earlier than Wood started retaining Jack from him’ – a declare she denied.Wood has allegedly spoken of her fears of retaliation from the singer, saying in custody court docket: ‘I’m a key witness in a pending prison investigation. In reference to the investigation, I allege that I used to be the sufferer of torture, rape, and pedophilic grooming by an deliberately identified public determine.’I’m extraordinarily afraid of the alleged offender. I’ve suffered a extreme, traumatic bodily and emotional harm at his palms, and I’m afraid that he will search retribution towards me for testifying by harming me, our son, and members of our household.’It was additionally claimed that Wood alleges she was instructed ‘immediately by investigators’ that her household’s security was at threat.Bell is alleged to have filed paperwork with the court docket claiming Wood was ‘retaining their son from him’, that it ‘should not matter what was occurring with Manson’, and that the pair ought to share custody of their son in LA.He wrote: ‘Whatever fears Evan could have relating to third events ought to don’t have anything to do with me or custody of our son. I don’t even need to consider the short- and long-term psychological hurt Evan may be inflicting upon Jack with this type of discuss and my extended separation from him.’Wood responded, denying she had stored Jack from Bell and expressed her ‘actual and deep considerations’ relating to her and Jack’s security ought to the pair reside in LA.The new custody association was signed and filed with the LA County Courts. The submit Singer Marilyn Manson hits back at actress Evan Rachel Wood’s claims he threatenedherson appeared first on Linda Ikeji Blog.
Powered by WPeMatico